The three-year study examined breakfast consumption and total daily food and nutrient intake for more than 4 300 students in grades 2 through 6 at 153 US elementary schools.
The researchers compared schools that offered "universal-free" breakfast to all students, regardless of income, and schools participating in the federal government's School Breakfast Programme that offers free or reduced-price breakfast for children from families with incomes below the poverty line.
On average, the students in the universal-free programmes consumed less cholesterol than students in the School Breakfast Programme. But the study found no significant differences between the two groups of students in terms of total daily dietary intake, overall quality of their diets, or rates of skipping breakfast.
Improvements are needed"Students who cannot eat breakfast at home should have the opportunity to eat it at school," the researchers wrote. "This study and others have shown that improvements in children's nutrient intake are needed, particularly with regard to food energy, fat, sodium and fibre, as well as calcium for older children."
The study was conducted by researchers at the US Department of Agriculture and the research firm Abt Associates. It was published in the November issue of the Journal of the American Dietetic Association. – (HealthDayNews)
Read more:Child nutrition Centre
Healthy snacks and lunch box ideas
November 2006