advertisement
06 February 2015

Less popular surgery tied to greater weight loss

Biliopancreatic diversion, a less-popular type of weight loss surgery, may lead to more weight loss than gastric bypass, but is linked to more complications.

1


A less-popular type of weight loss surgery might actually lead to more weight loss than gastric bypass – the currently favoured form of obesity surgery. But, the trade-off seems to be more complications, new research suggests.

A small comparative analysis found that a procedure called biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (or simply "duodenal switch") seems to lead to greater weight loss than traditional gastric bypass surgery. In addition, duodenal switch patients had a bigger drop in cholesterol, triglycerides and blood sugar levels.

"Five years after surgery, the average reductions in weight were 41 kilograms [90 pounds] after gastric bypass and 66 kilograms [145 pounds] after duodenal switch," said study co-author Dr. Torsten Olbers, an assistant professor of surgery at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Read: What is gastric bypass surgery?

But "patients who underwent duodenal switch also had more subsequent surgical procedures related to the initial operation, and more hospital admissions for nutritional complications, compared to patients who underwent gastric bypass," Olbers added.

The study findings were published in the online edition of JAMA Surgery.

According to the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, gastric bypass is currently considered the gold standard of weight loss (or "bariatric") procedures, and is the most common such surgery. It involves dividing and reconnecting portions of both the stomach and the small intestine to create a smaller stomach pouch, while re-directing the food absorption pathway.

By contrast, the duodenal switch procedure entails the removal of a portion of the stomach and bypassing a large portion of the small intestine, the society explained.

Read: Gastric band versus bypass – benefits and risks

To explore the pros and cons of each, the study team focused on 60 patients aged 20 to 50. Their average weight was around 355 pounds, according to the study. That translates to an average body mass index (BMI) of between 50 and 60. Anyone with a BMI in excess of 40 is considered to be severely obese, according to the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.

About half the patients underwent standard gastric bypass surgery, while the other half underwent the duodenal procedure. In the end, 55 patients were tracked for five years.

The result: by the five-year mark the gastric bypass group shed an average of nearly 14 BMI points, while the duodenal group shed more than 22 points.

The researchers also found that blood pressure, lung function and the incidence of type 2 diabetes were similar among the two groups, as was overall quality of life. But, the duodenal group showed greater reductions in cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting blood sugar levels.

Read: Rare surgery for weight loss

However, those in the duodenal group were also prone to a much higher risk for nutritional complications, gastrointestinal problems and re-hospitalisation. Almost 80 percent of duodenal patients experienced one or more complications during the post-surgery timeframe. That compares to 68 percent in the gastric bypass group, according to the study.

While less than 10 percent of the gastric bypass group had to undergo more surgical procedures as a result of their initial operation, that figure rose to nearly 45 percent among the duodenal group, the researchers found.

Olbers and his colleagues concluded that, despite its apparent superiority as a means to help obese patients lose weight, the "duodenal switch should be used with caution".

Read: Smoking and obesity can cost you a lot of money

This point was seconded by a pair of University of Michigan researchers, who stated in a journal editorial that "the benefits of undergoing duodenal switch hardly seem worth the sacrifice when compared with gastric bypass".

Dr. Mitchell Roslin, chief of bariatric and metabolic surgery at Lenox Hill/North Shore-LIJ Health System Hospital in New York City, argued that the more important message is that "gastric bypass is just not an adequate therapy for many patients".

"I really believe that the conclusion this team draws is way too in favour of gastric bypass. Their thinking makes light of weight loss, which is the goal of any of these procedures. And more than half the gastric bypass patients remained morbidly obese at the five-year point, a figure that I guarantee would go precipitously higher if you take another look five years later," he added.

"Now yes, it's true that you have to be concerned that duodenal switch [surgery] may be too powerful for some patients. But gastric bypass just doesn't work well. So the goal should be to try and find a balance by modifying the duodenal procedure to minimize the harsh effects and maximise outcomes, which is something I and others are working to do right now," Roslin said.

Also read:

Overweight teen girls have higher acne risk
Obesity most contagious among siblings
Losing weight may ease heartburn

Copyright © 2016 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

 
NEXT ON HEALTH24X
advertisement

Read Health24’s Comments Policy

Comment on this story
1 comment
Comments have been closed for this article.

Live healthier

The debate continues »

Working out in the concrete jungle 7 top butt exercises for guys 10 things pole dancing can do for you

The running vs. walking debate

There are many different theories when it comes to the running vs. walking for health and weight loss.

Veganism a crime? »

Running the Comrades Marathon on a vegan diet Are vegans unnatural beasts? Can a vegan be really healthy?

Should it be a crime to raise a baby on vegan food?

After a number of cases of malnourishment in Italy, it may become a crime to feed children under 16 a vegan diet.