27 July 2010

Adults born in famine show higher pre-diabetes risk

Middle-aged adults born at the height of China's famine in the 1950s and 60s may have a greater risk of abnormally high blood sugar than those born a few years earlier or later.

Middle-aged adults born at the height of China's famine in the 1950s and 60s may have a greater risk of abnormally high blood sugar than those born just a few years earlier or later, a new study finds.
The findings, reported in the journal Diabetes, support the theory that nutrition and growth during fetal development may affect the odds of developing type 2 diabetes later in life. Previous studies, for example, have found a relationship between low birth weight and higher diabetes risk in adulthood in both developed and developing countries, said Dr. Frank B. Hu, of the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, the senior researcher on the study. Adults born at a low weight have also been found to have higher risks of heart and kidney disease than those born within the normal range.

'Developmental origins' hypothesis

These latest findings, Hu told Reuters Health in an email, give further support to the "developmental origins" hypothesis. According to that theory, poor nutrition during pregnancy may alter fetal development in a way that affects lifelong metabolism and disease risks. For example, Hu noted, animal research suggests that poor fetal nutrition may affect the structure and function of cells in the pancreas that produce insulin, the hormone that regulates blood sugar. In humans, problems in the body's response to insulin precede the development of type 2 diabetes.
For their study, Hu and his colleagues looked at blood sugar levels among 7 874 Chinese adults born between 1954 and 1964. Those born between October 1, 1959 and September 30, 1961 were considered to have been exposed to the nation's famine during fetal development. Those born earlier were categorised as exposed during early-, mid- or late-childhood; those born later were considered "unexposed." Overall, roughly 6 percent of the fetal-exposed group had hyperglycaemia - blood sugar that was abnormally high but not yet high enough for a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.

Foetal exposure to the famine

That compared with just over 2 percent of the group unexposed to the famine. Adults exposed to the famine during late-childhood also had a 6-percent rate of hyperglycemia. But when the researchers considered other factors - such as study participants' age, exercise levels and smoking habits - they found that foetal exposure to the famine, especially in the regions of China most severely affected, was linked to an increased risk of hyperglycaemia.
Of fetal-exposed adults from the most severely affected areas, just over 7 percent had hyperglycaemia, versus 2 percent of the unexposed group, and anywhere from 2 percent to 5 percent of those exposed during childhood.
With other factors taken into account, adults in the group exposed during fetal development were four times more likely than their unexposed counterparts to have hyperglycaemia. What's more, the researchers found a particularly strong link between fetal exposure to the famine and hyperglycaemia among adults who currently had an "affluent" Western-style diet rather than a traditional Chinese diet. This group had the highest prevalence of hyperglycaemia, at 19 percent. According to Hu, this suggests that a "rich" diet later in life may worsen any effects of fetal undernourishment on the long-term risk of hyperglycaemia.

Pregnancy nutrition 'critical'

The researchers found no clear association, however, between famine exposure of any kind and the risk of type 2 diabetes in adulthood. But that, they say, may be because there too few diabetes cases; at the time of the study, those in the foetal-exposed group were in their early 40s, and type 2 diabetes is most common after the age of 45. None of the findings prove that fetal nutrition, itself, affects the long-term risk of hyperglycaemia - or, by extension, type 2 diabetes. But they add to evidence of an association between nutrition in the womb and adult disease risks, according to the researchers.
The bottom line, Hu said, is that adequate nutrition during pregnancy is "critical" for both mom and baby.
According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), normal-weight women should get, on average, an extra 300 calories per day during pregnancy, and gain about 25 to 35 pounds by the end. Overweight and obese women should be more careful about their calories since their weight-gain recommendations are lower: 15 to 25 pounds for overweight women, and 11 to 20 pounds for those who are obese.
All pregnant women, according to ACOG, should eat a well-balanced diet and, in most cases, use prenatal vitamins to ensure that they are getting enough nutrients. During pregnancy, women need extra amounts of certain nutrients, like iron, folic acid and vitamins B6 and B12. - (Reuters Health, July 2010)


Read Health24’s Comments Policy

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Ask the Expert

Diabetes expert

Dr. May currently works as a fulltime endocrinologist and has been in private practice since 2004. He has a variety of interests, predominantly obesity and diabetes, but also sees patients with osteoporosis, thyroid disorders, men's health disorders, pituitary and adrenal disorders, polycystic ovaries, and disorders of growth. He is a leading member of several obesity and diabetes societies and runs a trial centre for new drugs.

Still have a question?

Get free advice from our panel of experts

The information provided does not constitute a diagnosis of your condition. You should consult a medical practitioner or other appropriate health care professional for a physical exmanication, diagnosis and formal advice. Health24 and the expert accept no responsibility or liability for any damage or personal harm you may suffer resulting from making use of this content.

* You must accept our condition

Forum Rules