Posted by: VO2max | 2007/04/06


hi there

thank you for that VO2max explanation!
I did do the test with the mask and treadmill. So then you say that air might have escaped?interesting.
so basically it could not have been a physiological error, but a technical error with the treadmill/mask/computer/heart rate monitor?

also...i dont understand why my RER started on 1 and went down slowly to 0.79 then went up again to a maximum of 1.38, falling again to 1.25 by the end of the test. Shouldn't the RER start at arounf 0.78 or so,and isn't 1.38 really high?i am quite confused now.

oh...another question.....if i want to reference what you said
about the 235 bpm on the heart rate monitor, how do i do that?

sorry for all these questions at once, but i really trust your answers and really appreciate it!

Not what you were looking for? Try searching again, or ask your own question
Our expert says:
Expert ImageFitnessDoc

HI there

The heart rate is definitely an error - there's no doubt about that. And you can't reference it, you just have to speculate that the erratic behaviour and the sudden changes to an unphysiological heart rate are a sign of technical problems.

As for the VO2max, the other possibility is that your calibration procedures were incorrect, which would also explain the high RER to begin with and at the end. Remember how you define RER, and that will tell you that it's either that the CO2 was being over-read or the oxygen under. Again, this might be a mask problem.

Just remember that in science, you very rarely KNOW the cause, so you can't write "The mask was loose". You can speculate and suggest possible causes, but especially when it comes to technical issues, it's difficult to say definitively what the problem was. But I strongly suspect that the mask probably slipped off allowing air to escape - you may want to look at the volumes for that - the minue ventilation is the best one there - did that drop midway through the test? And there is a question on the calibration. Unfortunately, we have to trust our equipment, and that makes this a bit of a 'sell-out', but considering it's your first exposure to the technique, it's a reasonable suggestion. Remember, the motivation for these things (and hence your referencing) is always that it's an unphysiological - if you can't explain something with physiology, then technical/equipment problems are likely explanations.

Good luck!

The information provided does not constitute a diagnosis of your condition. You should consult a medical practitioner or other appropriate health care professional for a physical exmanication, diagnosis and formal advice. Health24 and the expert accept no responsibility or liability for any damage or personal harm you may suffer resulting from making use of this content.

Have your say

Thanks for commenting! Your comment will appear on the site shortly.
Thanks for commenting! Your comment will appear on the site shortly.