advertisement
Question
Posted by: SA WOMAN | 2007/04/02

FEMALES AND FORESKIN

SHOCKED AT YOUR IGNORANCE GYNAEDOC BEING CIRCUMCISED HAS HIGHER INCIDENCE LEVEL OF PENILE INFECTIONS ? WHO TAUGHTTHAT DRIVEL ? BEING BORN A MALE IS NOT A DISORDER REQUIRING AMPUTATION OF HIS PENIS ? GOOD GOD
FEMALE VAGINA HAS 5,000 TIMES MORE SKIN THAN ANY MALE PENIS AND THEY HAVEHIGHER INFECTION RATE THAN ANY MALE INTACT PENIS AND THEY DONT REMOVE ANY SKIN!!
ARE YOU ALL THERE
AND YES MEDICALL Y PROVEN A CIRCUMCISED PENIS DOES SCAR THE INNER SKIN OF THE VAGINA AS THERE ISNO SMOOTH GLIDING SKIN ON PENIS SHAFT OPENING THE VAGINA TO FURTHER INFECTIONS
FACT
STOP SPREADING
MALICIOUS LIES ABOUT MALES WHOP R INTACT ALL ALL MALES R BORN NORMAL AND INTACT
IF SO COORECT AND GOOD WHAY R ONLY 14 % OF ALL MALES IN WORLD BUTCHERED GYNAEDOC?
STOP MISLEADING PEOPLEMALES R BORN NORMAL AND INTACT

Not what you were looking for? Try searching again, or ask your own question
Our expert says:
Expert ImageGynaeDoc

These are a few medical references regarding circumcision and infection. This does not mean that all uncircumcised men will get these problems.
The fact that people are born a certain way does not mean that there will not be problems - appendicitis is an example.

Sexually Transmitted Infections, Vol 74, Issue 5 368-373, Copyright © 1998 by Sexually Transmitted Infections


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORIGINAL ARTICLES


Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks
S Moses, RC Bailey and AR Ronald
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: Globally approximately 25% of men are circumcised for religious, cultural, medical, or parental choice reasons. However, controversy surrounds the procedure, and its benefits and risks to health. We review current knowledge of the health benefits and risks associated with male circumcision. METHODS: We have used, where available, previously conducted reviews of the relation between male circumcision and specific outcomes as "benchmarks", and updated them by searching the Medline database for more recent information. RESULTS: There is substantial evidence that circumcision protects males from HIV infection, penile carcinoma, urinary tract infections, and ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases. We could find little scientific evidence of adverse effects on sexual, psychological, or emotional health. Surgical risks associated with circumcision, particularly bleeding, penile injury, and local infection, as well as the consequences of the pain experienced with neonatal circumcision, are valid concerns that require appropriate responses. CONCLUSION: Further analyses of the utility and cost effectiveness of male circumcision as a preventive health measure should, in the light of this information, be research and policy priorities. A decision as to whether to recommend male circumcision in a given society should be based upon an assessment of the risk for and occurrence of the diseases which are associated with the presence of the foreskin, versus the risk of the complications of the procedure. In order for individuals and their families to make an informed decision, they should be provided with the best available evidence regarding the known benefits and risks.


http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020391

Best wishes




The information provided does not constitute a diagnosis of your condition. You should consult a medical practitioner or other appropriate health care professional for a physical exmanication, diagnosis and formal advice. Health24 and the expert accept no responsibility or liability for any damage or personal harm you may suffer resulting from making use of this content.

3
Our users say:
Posted by: VIRGINIA | 2007/04/04

THAT SOCALLED REPORT HAS BEEN DEBUNKED AND YOU STILL REFUSE TO APOLOGISE FOR YOUR ECKLESS STATEMENTS PERTAINING TO THE FACT THAT ALL ALL ALL ALL MALES ARE BORN HEALTHY NORMAL AND ITNACT
NO MALE BEING BORN REQUIRES AMPUTATION OF HIS HEALTHY FUNCTIONAL PENIS
MEDICAL DATA REFLECTS THAT ONLY ONLY 1 % OF ALL MALE S MAY NOTE MAY REQUIRE A PENILE AMPUTATION ONLY 1 % EVER
MALES ARE NOT BORN DIFFERENT
ALL ARE BORN NORMAL AND INTACT WITH FOREKSIN
WITH SUCH BIZARRE STATEMENTS WHICH YOU CONDONE HOW DO YOU REVIEW THE FACT THAT FEMALE VAGINA HAS 5,000 TIMES MORE SKIN THAN ANY MALE PENIS AND NO RECOMMENDSTION THAT FEMALES GET CIRCUMCISED ?
ARE YOU INSANE GYNAEDOC ?
UNETHICAL ABUSE HERE
SERVES NO PURPOSE ANYWHERE TO CIRCUCMISE AND MUTILATE NEWLY BORN MALES EVER
THE FACTS YOU PRESENTD ARE AMERICAN TRAINED MEICIS WHO HAVE NO TRAININGWITH REGARD TO A MALE FOREKSIN
ALL THEY SEE IS A FOREKSIN AS A DIRTY PIECE OF EXTRA SSKIN
WHERE IS THE WELL DOCUMENTED RESEARCH ABOUT THE MALE FORKSIN
PLENTY OF SECIENTIFIC REPORTS DEALING WITH SEXUAL PYSXCGHOLOCAL AND EMOTINSAL ABUSE
ARE YOU BLIND?
GOOD GOD
WHY YOU THINK MALES CIRCUCISE AE HIGHER INCIDENCE LEVEL OF RAOD RAGE RAPE ETC?
WHY
JUST LOOK AT THESE SOCIETIES
READ THE WORK OR PROF RONALD GOLDMAN OF HARVARD MED SCHOOL
DEBUNKS THESE DOCS HERE
COULD NOT FIND
THERE RESEARC HTHEY FOUND ALL HAS BEEN DEBUNKED
HAVINGA CIRCUMCISED PENIS HAS HIGHER INCIDENCE LEVEL FOR INFECTION OF THE PENIS
MEDICALLY PROVEN
PLSE DO YOUR HOMEWORK
YOU AREA SOCIAL DISGRACE TOO INFORM MALES WHO HAVE FORKESIN THAT THEY R DISEAED AND HAVE A DISADVANTAGE
THAT IS UNETHUICAL AND IELLGAL

Reply to VIRGINIA
Posted by: Virginia | 2007/04/02

Shocked Gynae at your reckless previous statement !
How can you as a trained medical person inform males that are ALL born normal and INTACT that they d=carry infection and disease if not circumcised !
Thjat is gross irresponsible abuse. Have reported you to the Medical Council. How dare you !
Males are all born normal and intact. Further more a well known medical fact that if a circumcised penis thrusts into a female vagina the vaginalining will be SCARRED badly by the circumcised penis. Why males are born with a foreskin.
By the way gynae why are males all all born INTACT ?

Reply to Virginia
Posted by: LEE | 2007/04/02

WELL SAID TOTALLY AGREE ON THE PREVIOUS POST BOTH THOSE 2 MISGUIDED LADIES HAVE NO RIGHT TO REMOVE ANOTHERS HEALTHY BODY TISSUE
READ THE ALW NOT YOUR BODY
VICIOUS VILE MUTILAITON AND OPENS THE PENISTO INFECTION WHEN CIRCUCMISED
WHY U THINK ALL MALES R BORN NORMAL AND INTACT
GOOD GOD WHAT STUPDITY
A FEMALE VAGINA HAS 5,000 TIMES MORE SKIN THAN ANY MALE PENIS
BE WARNED U CIRCUMSIE AND VIOATEYR SOPNS BODY YOU WILL BE CHARGED WITH MALE GENITAL RAPE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT

Reply to LEE

Have your say

Thanks for commenting! Your comment will appear on the site shortly.
Thanks for commenting! Your comment will appear on the site shortly.
advertisement