Posted by: R | 2009/09/28


Hi. I had my first baby 2 yrs ago by c-sec. I had my heart set on going natural, but the doc said baby was breeched, and therefore it was necessary to have the c-sec. The date for the op was a week earlier than natural del would have been. On the morning of the op, the scan still showed baby to be breeched, and throughout the pregnancy he did not kick at all. I often felt his hands moving tho, and he was generally very active. I also felt his head lodged against my rib cage which was often sore. But my question is - was there no chance of him turning at all, could nothing have been done to help him turn? And what could have caused this? Also, much is said about not being able to have natural delivery after a caesar, but how true is this, esp if the next one is many years later? My ' baby'  is now a healthy, happy toddler. Many thanks.

Not what you were looking for? Try searching again, or ask your own question
Our expert says:
Expert ImageGynaeDoc

The chances of the baby turning after 36 weeks are very small. It is possible to manually turn the baby, but this does carry a small risk of bleeding nd fetal distress. In terms of vaginal birth after caesarean, this is possible depending on the circumstances of the next pregnancy.

Best wishes

The information provided does not constitute a diagnosis of your condition. You should consult a medical practitioner or other appropriate health care professional for a physical exmanication, diagnosis and formal advice. Health24 and the expert accept no responsibility or liability for any damage or personal harm you may suffer resulting from making use of this content.

Have your say

Thanks for commenting! Your comment will appear on the site shortly.
Thanks for commenting! Your comment will appear on the site shortly.