Expressing any dietary recommendation in terms of 10% of energy may mean be clear to dietitians, but I suspect that the majority of citizens will not fully understand this message.
Here is an example of what this actually means in terms of grams of saturated fat intake per day: If you are an adult consuming 2,000 kilocalories (8,400 kJ) per day, then 10% of that quantity of energy is 200 kcal (840 kJ) per day. Each gram of fat (any type – saturated, unsaturated etc.), supplies 9 kcal (37 kJ) of energy per gram, so divide 200 by 9 or 840 by 37 = 22g of saturated fat a day.
Read: Understanding the different kinds of fat in our diet
But most fats and fatty foods derived mainly from animal sources such as butter, cream, eggs, red meat, organ meats, full-cream milk and hard cheeses, and sometimes from plants (hard margarines, coconut oil and all products made from these fats), contain a mixture of saturated and unsaturated fats, so how do the members of the public know which foods they need to reduce to achieve the suggested goal of 22 g of saturated fat per day?
If you are enthusiastic you can check on food labels and add up your saturated fat intake every day, but broadly speaking you would need to reduce your intake of foods that contain saturated fat as listed above.
Read: Saturated fat may not cause heart disease
This type of a recommendation will certainly not go down well with Banters and Paleo Diet adherents!
Opposition to the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans
Long before these Dietary Guidelines were published, there was a great deal of debate about the suggested inclusions and exclusions during the public comment stage when 29 000 public comments were received by the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (the committee) compared to only 2,000 in 2010.
According to Nina Teicholz, author of “The Big Fat Surprise”, writing in The BMJ (previously the British Medical Journal), some of the typical criticisms levelled at the new US Dietary Guidelines included the following:
- The committee did not ask the Nutrition Evidence Library to carry out a formal review of the literature from the past 5 years to clarify their stance on saturated fats.
- In addition the possible role of low carbohydrate diets in reducing the incidence of certain conditions (obesity, diabetes etc.) was not adequately clarified.
- The committee appears to be advocating a shift away from animal-based foods to plant-based foods ever since 2010, but does not specify a ceiling for red meat intake.
- The recommended diets (vegetarian, healthy-Mediterranean and healthy US-style diets) were also not researched and scrutinised adequately.
- Despite the fact that the intake of fruit juice should be reduced, the Guidelines equate a cup of 100% fruit juice with 1 cup of fruit.
Teicholz maintains, “The overall lack of sound science and proper methods in the 2015 report could be seen as reluctance to depart from existing dietary recommendations.” This reluctance to change which tends to create bias and favours maintenance of the status quo, may undermine the acceptance of the new Guidelines.
Teicholz also identifies a variety of potential conflicts of interest in role players who influenced the compilation of the new Guidelines. In her opinion, representatives of food industry are still exerting an influence on the American Dietary Guidelines.
How do the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans affect South Africa?
Considering that the majority of our population are not economically empowered to buy large quantities of foods derived from animals, a situation exacerbated by the severe drought we are facing, there are some positive aspects in the latest American Dietary Guidelines in relation to our country: Our national diet is being shifted to being “plant-based” because of ecological, climatic and economic factors, and we already have legislation to reduce salt intake.
Read: 10 tips to reduce your salt intake
Moves are also afoot to curb excessive alcohol and sugar consumption in South Africa and the emphasis in our revised Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG) is that we need to eat a variety of foods (if possible) that have low-fat, low-sodium, and low-sugar contents.
The South African (SA) FBDG promote the intake of vegetables, fruit, unsifted grains and legumes, low-fat milk and dairy products like cottage cheese, yoghurt or amazi/maas, lean meat, fish and eggs (when affordable), plant oils rich in mono- and poly unsaturated fatty acids, and clean, safe water. In addition, the public are encouraged to ‘Be active’ or engage in physical activity at work and during exercise to ensure health and normal weight.
I believe that the revised South African FBDG (2012) are suitable for the circumstances of our population and the challenges we face from ecological and climatic changes. We are, therefore, in a position to watch the roll-out of the American Dietary Guidelines knowing that we have adequate guidelines of our own.
It would, however, be welcome if the various mega-committees and organisations in the USA could come up with some substantiated proof regarding the role, if any, of high-fat, low-carbohydrate diets, and solve the latest dietary conundrums regarding red meat and processed meat, as well as alcohol intake exceeding one drink a week!
Great new SA Food Guide
The new food rules
A healthy, low-fat slimming diet
- Apple, S (2015) What the government’s dietary guidelines may get wrong. Published 10 Oct 2015 – what-the-dietary-guidelines-for-americans....
- NNW (2012). Guide for health eating. Revised FBDG National Nutrition Week (NNW), 9-15 Oct 2012. http:www.nutritionweek.co.za.
- Teicholz N (2015). The scientific report guiding the US dietary guidelines: is it scientific? BMJ 2015;351:h4962; Time (2016). New dietary advice for Americans. Published on MWeb on 15 January 2016.