Advertisement
Weight loss: how much?
Crash diets don't work. Here's how fast you should lose weight to keep the kilos off.
Light pollution
Our artificially-lit nights aren't good for us, and may even cause cancer.
     TERMS     GET A DAILY HEALTH TIP  
  
MAKE HEALTH24 YOUR HOMEPAGE   
H24 NEWS MEDICAL SCHEMES DIET FITNESS NATURAL MAN WOMAN SEX PREGNANCY CHILD TEEN SUN
FOCUS CENTRES MEDS ORAL PET MIND GRAPHICS VIDEOS ANTI-AGEING WIN TOOLS EXPERTS TALK FIND

Links
 Child
 Teens
 Healthy home
 Erectile dysfunction
 Find a buddy
 Body Under Construction
 Prostate Centre
 Fitness
 Sexuality
 Diet & Food
 Psychology

Cybershrink says
The body language of power
From Hillary, to Obama, to McCain, Huckabee and Romney: CyberShrink leaves no turn unstoned.

The presidential candidates this time around are more interesting than they were in 2004. That doesn't take much, though. We have the Chipmunk, the Stepford Wife, the man you could take home to mother, and some also-rans.

 
Advertisement
What do their body language and the way they choose to carry themselves in public reveal about them?

The main contest
The more you see of Barack Obama, the more you like him. It's the opposite with Hillary Clinton – the more you see of her, the more disquieted you feel.

That doesn't mean I wouldn't like to see a woman elected as president of the US – but does it have to be Hillary? To elect the wrong woman as president could make it an awfully long time before there is another.

Though she's aiming to convey confidence, Clinton comes across as smug, cocky, and imperious. She seems to ooze a sense of entitlement, and seems cold and aloof, as if she has carefully rehearsed the motions of appearing friendly. It all seems planned, and above all, stale. There's something about her robotic movements, always stiff, never appearing spontaneous… she's often even jerky. She makes even the tightly-wound Martha Stewart seem sloppy. And that hair! The heavily-lacquered approach adds to the helmet-hard, unapproachable feeling.

Obama comes across as warm, friendly (but no pushover), sincere, and intelligent. And, above all, fresh.

When Clinton was doing badly in New Hampshire, she appeared momentarily tearful, created a sensation and a major boost in her popularity. Apparently, the revelation that she might be human was greatly encouraging to her supporters. I found the scene off-putting. She seemed to me to be calculating even now, recognising her moment of weakness as an opportunity, and making sure the cameras got it.

When Hillary talks, as she does, of the depth and breadth of her experience, one has to ask – of what? Is the experience of tolerating intolerable conduct in a spouse, really something we should expect of a president? Simply being the wife of a president doesn't equate to being experienced.

She repeatedly tells us she is ready to become Commander-in-Chief of the military – as if having sat for a time on the Armed Services Committee somehow prepares one to command troops. Her sole serious policy work was on the Clinton Health policy initiative, which utterly failed.

What about Iraq? This may be the single biggest blunder in recent American history. She voted for invasion, Barack against it. In response to her sneaky campaign ad about the emergency phone ringing in the White House – from the world's and America's point of view, which of them would one rather have answering that phone?

Obama feels like the future, Clinton like the past. She is a lifelong expert on politics, just when America is growing really tired of that. She jeers at Obama's lack of experience, apparently not recognising that this is precisely what many like about him – the extent to which he is untainted by the back rooms of Washington.

Hillary has complained that Barack has not been challenged on his claims, but I haven't seen her challenged on hers.

Those last-decade pants suits, the plastic grin, the smile that doesn't quite reach the eyes – these all make her appear like the past. She stands on stage, clapping in time to the music, aiming to look cool. She points at people in the audience, mouthing greetings. The pattern is predictable.

Obama, by contrast, comes across as genuinely inspiring and convincing, and shows a disarming and self-deprecating wit (I have never seen evidence of a Clinton sense of humour). He appears energetic, eager, and actually pleased to see people.

Huckabee and McCain
The Republican candidate who is no more, Mike Huckabee, was a bit of a no-hoper from the start. His substantial weight loss made him look like a slightly deflated Muppet. He always reminded me of a slightly shabby second-hand car salesman, selling away enthusiastically, but somehow aware that he wouldn't be getting any commission on this one. Yet Rolling Stone reports that this preacher once wanted to be a rock musician. Go figure.

John McCain has an interesting face, with the very wide cheeks of a chipmunk, more jowls than Hillary, and a rather small and tight mouth. He usually comes across as sincere, trustworthy and kindly, but apparently has a major reputation for a fierce temper, and is seen as testy and irritable.

Change and challenges
Everyone is talking of change (after George Bush and Cheney, who wouldn't want some sort of change?) Predictably, each candidate would have America believe that they themselves are the only one capable of bringing it about, without ever being very specific about exactly what changes they'd manage.

Too often forgotten is the issue of electability. I haven't managed to find anyone who doesn't like Obama. Not only his own party, but Independents and even surprisingly many Republicans like him. Whereas, despite the many who like Clinton a lot, there are also many, in her own party and outside it, who appear really to dislike her – and would either vote against her, or abstain.

Feminist comment
Lest it be thought, as some simplistic commentators say, that it is somehow anti-feminist to criticise Hillary, I was relieved to see the comments of the feminist guru, Germaine Greer, who called her cold, bossy and manipulative, and generally unappealing to feminists. It is not sexist to call a bossy person bossy. And I gather she described the Clinton marriage as "a strategic confederacy, not an emotional partnership". Ouch.

(Professor M. A. Simpson, March 2008)

References:
The Science of Presidential Complexity. Shankar Vedantam. Washington Post, Monday, January 28, 2008; Page A03

Lucian Gideon Conway III, University of Montana at Missoula, in the journal Political Psychology. 229 w
 
Print this article
 Rate this article
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent

 
 JOBS
RETAIL MANAGER
R16,000 Per Month
Gauteng - East Rand
Project Manager
Gauteng
Chief Accountant
R300,000-360,000 Per Annum Cost To Company
Gauteng
Treasury and Market Operations Manager
R400,000-600,000 Per Annum Cost To Company
Gauteng
Assistant Financial Manager (Chartered Accountant)
R380,000-450,000 Per Annum Cost To Company
Gauteng
Financial Accountant
Gauteng - North/Sandton
Operations / Logistics Supervisor
R20,000-22,000 Per Month Basic Salary
Gauteng
Audit Manage
Western Cape - Cape Town
Previous Next
 
Subscribe to...
*Daily tip
*Weekly tip
Want to subscribe to our newsletters?
Click here.
*Stand a chance to win R1000 every month!

 
 Other articles
Can trust be rebuilt?
Cheating: Are you just being suspicious?
What is cheating?
Crime: forgive and forget?
Why do people have affairs?
The curious death of Slobodan Milosevic
Milosevic: Distorting justice
'There's no easy way of saying this'
What are tsunamis?
Is sex addiction for real?
The history of sexual excess
Polite way of talking about breasts
Breasts in the media
A brief history of the breast
A last look at the Olympics
Tsunami - why the media frenzy?
The Olympics in the movies
Sizing up the small penis
John Mark Karr: the Suspicious Suspect
What can we make of Karr's 'confession'?
Why would ANYONE make a false confession?
Kampusch: Identifying with kidnapper?
Shot by their own army
Stolen babies
Psychosocial aspects of the Beslan Massacre
Cybershrink on the Virginia massacre
Analysing a killer
Cho: Towards a psychological autopsy
CyberShrink slams Dr Phil
Dr Phil makes a phool of himself
What's wrong with Britney?
Privacy, diagnosis and Britney
The man behind The Aviator
Jackson trial: CyberShrink comments
Sharon: Do we have the right to know?
Healed by faith
The Church and Mary visions
Visions in Benoni
Pareidolia
Lies, lies, all lies
Callie and Mandoza
The body language of power
A suicide epidemic
Gender bender
Political pornography
 Sponsored links
 Health24 links

Advertisement
 Top Condition
 Centres

 

© Health24 2000-2008. All rights reserved
  
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information.
Verify here.