Advertisement
Check your risk
Worried about getting cancer, diabetes, or a stroke? Assess your risk with one of our quick quizzes.
The best jokes
A while ago, our editor, Heather Parker, asked for readers' best jokes. Here they are.
     TERMS     GET A DAILY HEALTH TIP  
  
MAKE HEALTH24 YOUR HOMEPAGE   
H24 NEWS MEDICAL SCHEMES DIET FITNESS NATURAL MAN WOMAN SEX PREGNANCY CHILD TEEN SUN
FOCUS CENTRES MEDS ORAL PET MIND GRAPHICS VIDEOS ANTI-AGEING WIN TOOLS EXPERTS TALK FIND

Links
 Child
 Teens
 Healthy home
 Erectile dysfunction
 Find a buddy
 Body Under Construction
 Prostate Centre
 Fitness
 Sexuality
 Diet & Food
 Psychology

Cybershrink says
Crime: forgive and forget?
The level of violence accompanying crime is on the increase, say government stats. If you've been a victim of violent crime, whether you knew the perpetrator or not, you will know the rage that often follows such an incident. What should you do with these feelings?

 
Advertisement
CyberShrink comments on the nature of forgiveness and whether you should go down this road.

CyberShrink on forgiveness
I believe the whole concept of forgiveness has been cheapened and over-simplified by those who seem to care only for the perpetrators of suffering, and who show no genuine concern for the victims.

In a modern version of the story of the Good Samaritan, on seeing a battered and bleeding victim at the side of the road, these Bad Samaritans would pass by, exclaiming how much more in need of their attention must be the poor twisted individual who did this awful thing.

Is it necessary to forgive somebody who has no remorse, who has never said they were sorry for what they did, and who may continue to hurt us? My answer to this is both 'yes' and 'no'. The element of forgiveness that involves telling the person who caused the hurt that they needn't worry, that they're off the hook, that we expect nothing from them, is not necessary, nor healthy, nor helpful for society.

Genuine remorse necessary
Courts often convict perpetrators, citing lack of remorse as an aggravating circumstance. But what if the perpetrator is closer to home? Where does remorse fit into the picture when it comes to perpetrators known and unknown to the victim?

Unless the person causing hurt to others is genuinely remorseful, not only by saying so (seldom is speech so cheap as when the serial persecutor is promising it'll never happen again, while planning the next time), but also by actions that include a true change in their behaviour. (This is difficult to determine when you're dealing with a stranger who hijacked you - the state, in essence, becomes your protector here.)

On a more personal level, remorse should also contain an element of reparation, of making it up to the person who has been hurt - if these things are not present, I don't believe that they deserve or should receive any message of forgiveness. If the victim feels able to forgive, in this sense, and can do so without making themselves vulnerable to further hurt, that's fine.

Don't feel pressurised
But it is never the duty of any victim to do anything to make the person who hurt them feel better, let alone emboldened to continue behaving as they had done. This has to be an entirely voluntary and considered act, and not coerced as it has so often been by the sanctimonious preachers who themselves have rarely had any experiences deserving forgiving.

Do not feel guilty about not having been able to forgive the person who hurt you - why should you enable them to feel better about what they did?

The clutches of rage
But there is another far more important element of forgiveness, about which I feel fairly strongly. Unforgiveness, if we might so call a state in which we allow ourselves to continue to seethe and burn with anger against the person who hurt us, is unhealthy, and can prevent us from healing. We become tied to the perpetrator by such bonds of bitterness that we ourselves become far more entrapped by it than the object of our righteous fury.

To let go of that aspect of the past - not to forget about it, but to release ourselves from the claws of the bad feelings attached to it, is wholesome and helpful. It should be done for us, the victims, and not to enable the perpetrators to feel better or relieved. We can act towards the author of our pain with dignity and so as to set them an example of how they ought to have behaved, without making ourselves vulnerable again or enabling them to cause us more hurt. This could include getting rid of an abusive partner, or moving to a safer neighbourhood if you can afford it.

It does not include any right to retaliation, though this is a common impulse among those who have been badly hurt. Apart from the simple moral fact that retaliation is wrong, one must also note that it rarely if ever brings the substantial satisfaction we imagine it might. It, and that it includes the victim abandoning the moral and psychological superiority of their status, and sinking to the level of the perpetrator.

(Professor M.A. Simpson, aka Cybershrink, updated 2007)
 
Print this article
 Rate this article
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent

 JOBS
Civil Engineering Technician
Gauteng - Johannesburg
Human Capital Development Manager
R500,000-600,000 Per Annum
Gauteng - Midrand
Executive PA
Gauteng - North/Sandton
Stock Controller - Medical
R6,500-7,000 Per Month Negotiable
Western Cape
Pharmacy Stock Controller
R6,500-7,000 Per Month Negotiable
Western Cape
Staff Nurse
Western Cape
ICU Registered Nurse
Western Cape
Maternity Ward Nurse
Western Cape
Previous Next
 
Subscribe to...
*Daily tip
*Weekly tip
Want to subscribe to our newsletters?
Click here.
*Stand a chance to win R1000 every month!

 
 Other articles
Can trust be rebuilt?
Cheating: Are you just being suspicious?
What is cheating?
Crime: forgive and forget?
Why do people have affairs?
The curious death of Slobodan Milosevic
Milosevic: Distorting justice
'There's no easy way of saying this'
What are tsunamis?
Is sex addiction for real?
The history of sexual excess
Polite way of talking about breasts
Breasts in the media
A brief history of the breast
A last look at the Olympics
Tsunami - why the media frenzy?
The Olympics in the movies
Sizing up the small penis
John Mark Karr: the Suspicious Suspect
What can we make of Karr's 'confession'?
Why would ANYONE make a false confession?
Kampusch: Identifying with kidnapper?
Shot by their own army
Stolen babies
Psychosocial aspects of the Beslan Massacre
Cybershrink on the Virginia massacre
Analysing a killer
Cho: Towards a psychological autopsy
CyberShrink slams Dr Phil
Dr Phil makes a phool of himself
What's wrong with Britney?
Privacy, diagnosis and Britney
The man behind The Aviator
Jackson trial: CyberShrink comments
Sharon: Do we have the right to know?
Healed by faith
The Church and Mary visions
Visions in Benoni
Pareidolia
Lies, lies, all lies
Callie and Mandoza
The body language of power
A suicide epidemic
Gender bender
Political pornography




 Sponsored links
 Health24 links

Advertisement
 Top Condition
 Centres

 

© Health24 2000-2008. All rights reserved
  
We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information.
Verify here.