advertisement
 

General Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter to get all the latest health news


 

Aids denialist’s mystery death

Last updated: Monday, July 13, 2009 Print
 

In 1992, Christine Maggiore, a successful businesswoman, tested positive for HIV. The diagnosis sent her life spiralling in new directions that would see her embracing denialist views on HIV/Aids, burying her HIV-positive daughter after refusing to allow her Aids medicines, and meeting with former president Thabo Mbeki.

With Maggiore's death on 27 December, 2008, a chapter in the history of Aids denial came to an end. We do not know for certain what she died of, but we do know she had been suffering from pneumonia for at least six months prior to her death. Experts agree that the most likely explanation is that the pneumonia was Aids-related. This has not been confirmed by a coroner's report.

Those who had supported Maggiore in her rejection of established HIV science find it hard to contemplate that her death might have been Aids-related. They ‘blame’ a radical detoxification cleanse that Maggiore had taken shortly before her death. But, as Dr David H Gorski points out on the respected blog site Science-Based Medicine, ‘If Christine Maggiore was in fact so healthy, why did she think she needed to undergo such a radical detoxification regimen? Healthier people, a.k.a. the “worried well” who are most drawn to “alternative” medicine, tend to opt for much less radical detoxification regimens.’

A daughter's death
Whereas doubt clouds Maggiore's own death, a coroner’s report unequivocally found that the death of her 3-year-old daughter Eliza Jane Scovill in 2005 was caused by Aids-related pneumonia.

Maggiore had refused to take antiretroviral drugs during her pregnancy and insisted on breast-feeding Eliza Jane despite the risk of transmission.

Yet, soon after Eliza Jane's death, the LA Times quoted Maggiore as saying, ‘I have been brought to my emotional knees, but not in regard to the science of this topic. I am a devastated, broken, grieving mother, but I am not second-guessing or questioning my understanding of the issue.’

Anti-scientific views
‘Christine Maggiore died because of her anti-scientific view that HIV does not cause Aids,’ says Nathan Geffen, former Director of Research and Communications at the Treatment Action Campaign. ‘People are entitled to make their choices even if they are not in their own best interests, but in Maggiore's case she also convinced many other people not to take antiretrovirals and she refused to take them to prevent her own child from contracting HIV. Her child and many others died because of her. That is unforgivable.’

After becoming acquainted with the denialist views of Peter Duesberg (who would later serve on President Mbeki's Presidential Advisory Panel on Aids) in the mid-90s, Maggiore came to doubt that HIV causes Aids and founded the group Alive and Well Aids Alternatives – which encouraged HIV-positive pregnant woman to avoid taking Aids medicines. She also wrote a book called What If Everything You Thought You Knew about Aids Was Wrong, which sold over 50 000 copies, and made a number of TV and radio appearances.

She was also invited to the 13th International Aids Conference held in Durban in 2000 and met with then president Thabo Mbeki.

She formed part of the group of people who helped influence Mbeki and former health minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang's policies on HIV/Aids, and she certainly gained apparent credibility for herself by this association.

’By courting the Aids denialists, Mbeki has increased their stature in the United States,’ wrote Nicoli Nattrass, director of the Aids and Society Research Unit at the University of Cape Town, and Professor John Moore from Cornell University, in the International Herald Tribune. ‘He lent credibility to Christine Maggiore, a Californian who campaigns against using antiretrovirals to prevent transmission of HIV from mothers to children, when he was photographed meeting her.’

Indeed, Alive and Well (the organization founded by Maggiore) is still actively promoting the view that HIV does not cause Aids, and has received support from high-profile celebrities, including the American rock band The Foo Fighters.

Though the case made by Alive and Well may have the sheen of science, that is superficial: it is in fact selective and misleading. Denialist concerns about HIV/Aids have been answered many times over. For an excellent analysis of denialist myths, see the following two articles: The evidence that HIV causes Aids (from the US National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and Debunking denialist myths (on AidsTruth.org).

The cost of denial
Like Maggiore, denialists often claim they are exercising freedom of speech and that mainstream medicine is silencing dissent – Maggiore herself at times claimed only to be presenting an alternative – there is clear evidence of the impact that pseudoscience and Aids denial has had on the health of South Africans. Last year Harvard researchers said it was a conservative estimate that more than 330 000 lives had been lost to HIV/Aids in South Africa between 2000 and 2005 simply because the government failed to implement a feasible and timely antiretroviral treatment programme.

In addition, an estimated 35 000 babies were born with HIV during that same period because of government's reluctance to introduce a mother-to-child transmission prophylaxis programme using nevirapine (an anti-Aids drug).

Not implementing such programmes is of course exactly what Maggiore was campaigning for.

An end to denial?
According to Geffen, Aids denialism is declining, partly because Mbeki and Tshabalala-Msimang are no longer controlling South Africa's health system. New Health Minister Barbara Hogan was quick to go on record stating that "we know that HIV causes Aids."

Nevertheless, Geffen points out, there are still thousands of fake Aids cures being sold in South Africa, and getting rid of this kind of quackery will not be easy. For example, Peggy Nkonyeni, Kwazulu-Natal MEC for Health, has been reported to have close ties with a number of people selling untested cures. She also made headlines for suspending a doctor who had provided antiretroviral drugs to HIV-positive pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic in the province.

Geffen says we have our own Maggiores here ‘and they are far more deadly than her’. ‘Her (Maggiore's) book was featured on Criselda Kananda's radio show (on MetroFM). Kananda, like Maggiore, continues to try to convince people to take medical decisions that will likely result in their avoidable death,’ said Geffen.

Kananda, who has tested HIV positive herself, told the Citizen newspaper she will never take antiretrovirals because ‘they are a deadly and easy way out’. Like Maggiore she insists HIV does not cause Aids, and that Aids is instead the result of a compromised immune system, of living an unhealthy lifestyle and being attacked by infectious diseases.

(Marcus Low, Health24, Updated July 2009)

Read more:
HIV/Aids Centre

 

advertisement
 
 

Rate this article

Poor
Excellent
 
 

Your Comments

Zac 2009/01/15 Comment #1

Good intensions

Just goes to show that good intensions can be horribly destructive when you don' t have an open mind, especially when you go preaching your ignorance to the world like Maggiore.

Johan 2009/01/15 Comment #2

A TIMELY REMINDER

For all those peolpe out there who thinks Mbeki should still be president: I say good riddance! Mbeki and his denialist cronies (most of them now with COPE) has the blood of thousands of South Africans on their hands.

Charlie 2009/01/15 Comment #3

Aids

I don' t for one minute suggest that HIV does not lead to full blown AIDS, but how did this person live so long not taking antiretrovirals.

JD 2009/01/15 Comment #4

to Charlie

She lived for 16 years from being diagnosed to her death. This is not that unusual. In some people HIV simply progresses at a slower rate. Especially when they are otherwise healthy. We know that with antiretrovirals she would have lived much longer though.

mazolo 2009/01/15 Comment #5

ARV

I, personally, know people who were on ARV' s and died in less than 2 years after testing positive.

Vicky 2009/01/15 Comment #6

To all the denialists

I cannot believe that in this day and age with people dropping dead like floes all around us there are still idiots who believe this drivel that is being spread by ignorant fools. `obviously their brains were the first to be affected by AIDS. I have personally made sure that a friend of mine who was HIV positive and then developed fullblown AIDS, receive ARV' s (she was already at death' s door) 4 years down the line she is living a full healthy life and is able to work and look after her daughter

Que 2009/01/16 Comment #7

Becareful you not shooting the messenger.

There are 2 schools of thought. One given by the main stream media/drug companies, and the other by the so called " denialist’ s" . How many of you have truely reseached both points of view, before attacking the other? How many have read Christine Maggiore website: www.aliveandwell.org, or Adv Anthony Brink' s research: www.tig.org.za in addition to the mainstream news reports and sites linked off them?
Read both sides and then make up your own mind. I 4 one came away thinking something is fishy.

Zac 2009/01/16 Comment #8

To Que

Que. The sources you refer to are very one-sided. They cherrypick findings to suit that which they want to believe. If anyone actually wastes their time on it, please compare with the two myth busting articles linked to in the above article. Brink and co may pretend to be open-minded by they are still pushing long-discredited nonsense and pretending their is a contrivercy where there is none. Really, people on arvs live much longer, it has been shown in study after study.

Que 2009/01/16 Comment #9

Zac

Im not asking anyone to believe anything, all Im saying is educate yourself with all the knowledge you can and make up your own mind.

JD 2009/01/16 Comment #10

Educate yourself

Two schools of thought? That makes it sound as if you should spend equal time on denial and mainstream science. That would give you the wrong impression since denialism is far less than 1% of the conversation about HIV. While they are still stuck on a 1987 article, the rest of the world has moved on and talked about everything from vaccines, new drugs, microbicides, etc. By all means inform yourself, but take a balanced aproach.

Minaiza 2009/01/16 Comment #11

Que has a point

I think there is no one in this world that can prove for sure that a person on ARV' s can live longer than the one not using them, because there have been people on ARV that never even survived 3 years after testing HIV positive and those that where not on ARV and survived for more than 20 years after testing HIV positive, it still remains to be proved that those that survive longer is as a result of their immune system or the ARV' s, I think people should research both camps though.

Minaiza 2009/01/16 Comment #12

Mainstream Science

if there are ten HIV Patients on ARV' s and ten others not using ARV' s, no one can tell which Patients are gonna die first, the problem with the Mainstream is that they are not looking for ways to cure people but they are looking for ways to keep on milking countries that buy the medicines for their nations, this lucrative business will carry on forever until people start to realise what is really happening, YES HIV MIGHT CAUSE AIDS, BUT WHAT IS AIDS? A NUMBER OF DEASES NOW PRESENTED AS AIDS!!!

Sam 2009/01/16 Comment #13

To Minaiza

Minaiza. You are simply wrong. A study published in the BMJ last year found that people using combination therapy live on average 13 years longer than people who do not. Also, the use of arvs has cut the death-rate by 40% In other words, we can certainly say that arvs makes people live longer. . -|-//www.health24.com/news/HIV_AIDS/1-920,47313.asp

Minaiza 2009/01/16 Comment #14

To Sam

which statistic model was used? you simply will just assume that a person lives longer because of ARV' S, the truth is we cannot prove it and that is a fact, the study that was published does not hold substance as you cannot prove what makes certain individuals to live longer, it is a mystery that the science fraternity cannot overcome, to date we are living with assumption when it comes to HIV and AIDS, until such time there is concrete prove.

Sam 2009/01/16 Comment #15

To Minaiza

Minaiza. If you actually look at the BMJ article I am sure all your concerns will be answered.

Que 2009/01/16 Comment #16

Sam please link the BMJ article you referencing.

I can only find: Role of co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in reducing mortality in HIV infected adults being treated for tuberculosis: randomised clinical trial
-|-//www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/337/jul10_1/a257
And the result shown are more in the region of 7% than the 40% quoted in the link you provided.

The comment facility of this article has been closed.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Ask an expert

Do you need expert advice?

Blogs

People are blogging about HIV/Aids