10 October 2007

More psychology in the courtroom

New research has reported the need for greater cooperation between criminal law and psychiatry at determining the effect of each disorder on the individual’s responsibility.

Research carried out by the Department of Criminal Law at the University of Granada in Spain, has analysed the criminal sentences passed in Spain since 1870 in which a defendant was acquitted of the charge, or the sentence was reduced on account of mental disorder.

This research, in which more than 3 000 sentences were studied, has reported the need for greater cooperation between criminal law and psychiatry at determining the effect of each disorder on the individual’s responsibility.

It also warns of the lack of specialisation of forensic scientists in charge of determining the mental condition of the accused. As these forensic scientists have no specific training in psychiatry, sometimes medical reports do not provide the full guarantee needed.

Previous penal code ineffective
The research, carried out by Dr Gema María Fonseca Morales and directed by prof María José Jiménez Díaz, has revealed that under previous penal codes, Spanish justice has maintained a hesitant, fluctuating and sometimes contradictory line in cases regarding some alterations such as personality or neurotic disorders.

However, since the implementation of the current punitive text, sentences are proving more rigorous from the perspective of medical-psychiatric science and closer to current international classifications of mental diseases.

This research has revealed that the main axis of jurisprudence in this field is the poor application by the Spanish courts of the complete exemption of criminal responsibility. This can be attributed to the fact that for a very long period of time a complete and absolute alteration of reasoning and willing capacity (in practice nearly a coma) was necessary to declare incapacity for responsibility. This is an untenable requirement as in this situation it would be barely impossible to offend.

Better regulation
This research has showed that an article of the current Penal Code (which includes abnormality and mental disorder as grounds for exemption) is much better than its predecessor, as it is a very extensive formulation covering any kind of mental disorder if there is a certain psychological effect that causes the incapacity to understand the illegality of the action, or to act according to that understanding.

Finally, the research also reports that, because of their high cost, judges make limited application of security measures when there is an exemption on the account of abnormality or mental disorders.

Read more:
Murder linked to mental illness
Predicting criminal behaviour


Read Health24’s Comments Policy

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Live healthier

Exercise benefits for seniors »

Working out in the concrete jungle Even a little exercise may help prevent dementia Here’s an unexpected way to boost your memory: running

Seniors who exercise recover more quickly from injury or illness

When sedentary older adults got into an exercise routine, it curbed their risk of suffering a disabling injury or illness and helped them recover if anything did happen to them.