30 April 2012

Second-line ARTs suppress resistant HIV

African patients with resistant strains of HIV had favorable results from second line protease-inhibitor-based anti-retroviral therapy, with no increase in drug-resistant HIV.


African patients with resistant strains of HIV had favourable results from second-line protease-inhibitor-based anti-retroviral therapy (ART), with no increase in drug-resistant HIV mutants.

The findings "are clinically significant because they indicate expected treatment response in patient switched to second-line HIV treatment without genotypic resistance testing, as is the reality in resource-limited settings," lead researcher Dr. Kim Sigaloff from the University of Amsterdam told Reuters Health.

How the study was done

Conducted at 13 sites in Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe, the prospective study involved 243 adults who were switched to a second-line protease-inhibitor (PI)-based regimens following first-line treatment failure.

Among the 208 patients who continued second-line ART for at least a year, 28 (13.9%) had virological failure, defined as HIV RNA counts of 400 copies/ml or more.

Twenty-one patients (12.1%) had immunological failure, defined as CD4 cell counts persistently <100 cells/cu mm or a decline of more than 50% from peak levels during treatment.

Before patients were switched to the second-line drugs, the researchers had looked for drug resistance mutations; they found that in 55.2% of patients, the second-line drugs were likely to be only partially active. Resistance to nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-NRTIs was predominant.

The findings

"Our study demonstrates that empirically prescribed PI-based regimens can successfully re-suppress HIV, even in the absence of a fully-active NRTI backbone," the researchers said in a March 23 online report in the Journal of Infectious Diseases.

On multivariate analysis, virological failures were significantly linked to treatment compliance but not to the predicted activity of second-line regimens.

"The good immunological and virological response to partially-active second-line regimens, i.e. in participants who harbored NRTI resistance, is likely explained by the high potency and genetic barrier to resistance of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors," the researchers suggest.

They conclude, "Our data suggest potential for the use of simplified PI-based regimens after failure of an (non-NRTI)-based regimen."

 (C. Vidya Shankar, Reuters Health, April 2012) 

Read more:

Superinfected gives clues to HIV

Progress in hunt for HIV cure


Read Health24’s Comments Policy

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Ask the Expert

HIV/Aids expert

Dr Sindisiwe van Zyl qualified at the University of Pretoria before working for an HIV/AIDS NPO in Soweto for many years. She was named one of the Mail & Guardian's Top 200 Young South Africans in 2012.

Still have a question?

Get free advice from our panel of experts

The information provided does not constitute a diagnosis of your condition. You should consult a medical practitioner or other appropriate health care professional for a physical exmanication, diagnosis and formal advice. Health24 and the expert accept no responsibility or liability for any damage or personal harm you may suffer resulting from making use of this content.

* You must accept our condition

Forum Rules