Cancer

22 February 2007

Child cancer survivors at risk

A new study finds that childhood cancer survivors were nine times more likely to develop secondary malignancy.

0
Survivors of pediatric cancer face nine times the normal risk for developing a sarcoma at least five years after treatment for the initial cancer, a new study reveals.

The risk for developing sarcoma - a cancer of the connective or supportive tissue - is particularly elevated among patients with a family history of cancer or whose primary childhood bout was a form of sarcoma, a bone tumor or Hodgkin's lymphoma, the researchers found.

The use of radiation and certain kinds of chemotherapy drugs was also associated with higher sarcoma risk.

The observations are reported in the Feb. 21 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

"This study is a red flag," said lead author Dr. Tara O. Henderson, of the department of pediatrics within the hematology-oncology section at the University of Chicago's Pritzker School of Medicine. "And it shows that, if a patient with a history of childhood cancer later presents with a lump and a bump anywhere on their body, you need to be more suspicious of sarcoma than you would be for someone in the general population."

According to the American Cancer Society, more than three-quarters of all pediatric cancer patients now survive five years or more.

Secondary cancer leading cause of death
The authors note that previous research has shown that among such survivors, a secondary cancer of some kind is the leading cause of death. Sarcoma is known as a particularly stealthy though rare threat, whose nonspecific symptoms make it difficult to diagnose.

Henderson and her team analyzed data on more than 14,000 American and Canadian patients participating in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, the largest ongoing analysis of pediatric cancer patients conducted to date.

All the patients in the study were under the age of 21 when they were diagnosed with cancer between 1970 and 1986. All lived at least five years past their initial diagnosis of leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, neuroblastoma, sarcoma, kidney or bone cancer, or cancer of the central nervous system.

Over the study period, each participant completed three questionnaires concerning their health, treatment and family background. In that time, all deaths and sarcomas occurring at least five years after treatment were recorded.

What the study found
Henderson and her colleagues found that 751 secondary cancers developed among the study participants, of which 108 were sarcomas affecting 104 patients. Such sarcomas were diagnosed an average of 11 years after the pediatric cancer diagnosis.

Henderson and her team were able to grade the severity of the secondary sarcomas in 42 percent of the cases, and among those patients just over half had advanced-stage sarcoma at diagnosis. Overall, secondary sarcomas were determined to be the ultimate cause of death for more than one-third of the 104 secondary sarcoma patients.

The sarcoma patients were also found to be more likely to have received radiation for their pediatric cancer; to have received higher doses of two chemotherapy drugs (anthracycline and aklylators); to have a family history of cancer or a history of other secondary cancers themselves; or to have battled particular types of pediatric cancer, including sarcoma.

History of family cancer
The authors noted that a history of cancer among first-degree relatives was found in 22 percent of the sarcoma patients. They also pointed out that patients who were particularly young when first diagnosed with childhood cancer -- those under the age of 4 -- appeared to have the highest risk of developing sarcoma later.

The researchers observed that nearly 80 percent of the 104 sarcoma patients had received radiation, although they could only confirm that 56 percent of them had radiation targeting the area where secondary sarcoma ultimately developed.

Even those pediatric cancer patients who had never received radiation were still found to have a higher risk for developing sarcoma than the general population.

Henderson suggested that a constellation of factors is probably increasing sarcoma risk among childhood cancer survivors.

"While we confirmed that radiation is a risk and chemo might be as well, it also might be true that these particular patients carry some element of cancer susceptibility and predisposition that we don't understand yet," she said. "Figuring this out is the next phase of research we need to get into."

Findings should not alarm
Henderson stressed that the findings are not cause for undue alarm, as sarcoma remains a relatively rare cancer -- even for those at higher risk.

That point was echoed by Dr. Kevin Oeffinger, director of the Program for Adult Survivors of Pediatric Cancer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City.

"It's important to recognize that sarcoma is an uncommon cancer, so if something is 1-out-of-a-million risk for most and 9-out-of-a-million for others, it's still an uncommon outcome," he said.

"And while radiation was the treatment exposure associated with the highest risk, you have to remember that the majority of people who do have radiation as children will never have a second cancer," Oeffinger added. "And that dose of radiation is often a lifesaving part of that therapy. Clearly, if we're not able to cure the first cancer, then talking about a second cancer is without meaning."

Oeffinger, nevertheless, cautioned that pediatric cancer patients should be diligent about follow-up care.

He noted that his own research, conducted among the same pool of patients and reported in the New England Journal of Medicine last October, revealed that two of three such survivors will ultimately develop at least one chronic and sometimes life-threatening health problem 20 to 30 years after the cancer diagnosis.

"So, the take-home message is not to be overly concerned at this point, but to know that long-term follow-up care -- with a health-care professional that is familiar with their long-term risks -- is essential to all pediatric cancer survivors," Oeffinger said.

(HealthDayNews, February 2007)

Read more:
Stem cells fight child cancer
Cancer Centre

 

Read Health24’s Comments Policy

Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.

Ask the Expert

Cancer expert

CANSA’s purpose is to lead the fight against cancer in South Africa. Its mission is to be the preferred non-profit organisation that enables research, educates the public and provides support to all people affected by cancer. Questions are answered by CANSA’s Head of Health Professor Michael Herbst and Head of Advocacy Magdalene Seguin. For more information, visit cansa.org.za.

Still have a question?

Get free advice from our panel of experts

The information provided does not constitute a diagnosis of your condition. You should consult a medical practitioner or other appropriate health care professional for a physical exmanication, diagnosis and formal advice. Health24 and the expert accept no responsibility or liability for any damage or personal harm you may suffer resulting from making use of this content.

* You must accept our condition

Forum Rules