22 September 2011

Cigarette makers, FDA clash over new graphic ads

Cigarette makers clashed with the FDA in US federal court over graphic labels and advertising that use pictures of rotting teeth and diseased lungs to warn consumers about smoking.


Cigarette makers clashed with regulators in US federal court over new graphic labels and advertising that use pictures of rotting teeth and diseased lungs to warn consumers about the risks of smoking.

The tobacco industry asked Judge Richard Leon on Wednesday for a temporary injunction to block the US Food and Drug Administration's requirement for the labels, pending a final decision on whether the labels are constitutional.

The Obama administration argued, however, that the companies would not suffer irreparable harm without a preliminary injunction.

The labels are part of a 2009 law passed by Congress that requires colour warnings on cigarette packages and on printed advertising, which already carry text warnings from the US Surgeon General.

Pictures shocking

The industry says the new graphic warnings, due to go into effect by September 2012, force them to engage in anti-smoking advocacy on the government's behalf.

"Never before has the government required the maker of a lawful product to tell consumers not to buy it," said Noel Francisco, a lawyer arguing on behalf of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

"The government can tell people how to live," said Floyd Abrams, a prominent First Amendment specialist also representing the tobacco industry. "But they can't force people who sell tobacco to be their mouthpieces."

Francisco said the pictures were chosen for their shock value, and not because they reduced the rate of smoking or better informed consumers about its dangers.

Companies sue FDA

"If you tell people what they already know over and over again, in flashy letters and big colour pictures, it doesn't cause a reduction in smoking," he said.

Reynolds American Inc's R.J. Reynolds unit, Lorillard Inc, Liggett Group LLC and Commonwealth Brands Inc, owned by Britain's Imperial Tobacco Group Plc, sued the FDA over the labels.

They have argued they need a quick ruling because they would have to start in November or December and spend millions of dollars to comply with the requirements. Justice Department attorneys said the money was a small fraction of the companies' net sales.

Government attorneys also said the graphic labels conveyed the dangers of smoking more effectively than words alone, and were necessary to stop more people from smoking, especially teenagers.

Preventing death

"The government's interest here is not in preventing habits, it's in preventing death," said Mark Stern, a Justice Department attorney. "The advocacy here is to convey the negative health consequences of smoking. That's what Congress directed the FDA to do."

"The Constitution doesn't limit Congress to conveying information in a text-only format," he added, when Judge Leon questioned how far the government could go in presenting its message.

According to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, about 46 million US adults, or 20.6%, smoke cigarettes. There has been little change in the percentage since 2004.

More than 221,000 Americans are expected to be diagnosed with lung cancer in 2011, according to the American Cancer Society. Tobacco is expected to kill nearly 6 million people worldwide in 2011, including 600,000 non-smokers, the World Health Organization said.

Leon said he hoped to have a ruling on the preliminary injunction by the end of October, although any decision is likely to be appealed.

(Reuters Health, September 2011) 

Read more:

Tobacco companies



Read Health24’s Comments Policy

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Live healthier

Exercise benefits for seniors »

Working out in the concrete jungle Even a little exercise may help prevent dementia Here’s an unexpected way to boost your memory: running

Seniors who exercise recover more quickly from injury or illness

When sedentary older adults got into an exercise routine, it curbed their risk of suffering a disabling injury or illness and helped them recover if anything did happen to them.