Updated 16 October 2013

More vasectomies during recession

Wisconsin researchers say they have found a link between economic difficulties and men's decision to get a vasectomy done.

The financial crisis of 2008 and lingering economic woes are having an impact on men's reproductive decisions, new research suggests.

"With the current recession, it's pushing more guys to get a vasectomy done," said study author Dr Anand Shridharani, a men's reproductive and sexual health specialist at Erlanger Health System, in Knoxville, Tennessee.

Many urologists reported in 2009 that they were fielding more requests for vasectomies, suspecting the downturn in the economy as a reason and Shridharani's team attempted to find numbers to back up the reported trend.

He conducted the study while at the Medical College of Wisconsin and presented his findings at the joint meeting of the International Federation of Fertility Societies and American Society for Reproductive Medicine, held in Boston.

The researchers looked at the number of men having vasectomies at their facility in Wisconsin from June 2005 to October 2012. They also tracked the median income in Wisconsin and the rest of the US during those years.

A significant rise

"We found as the median income for Wisconsin declined, the rate of vasectomies annually went up," Shridharani said.

In 2005, 91 men had a vasectomy and the median state income was $54 269. In 2010, 239 men had a vasectomy and the income had dropped to $50 547.

"Comparing the number of vasectomies performed per year from 2005 to 2008 versus 2009 to 2012, the difference [an increase] is statistically significant," he said.

"The suspected reason is that having an unexpected child would increase the cost of living," he noted.

"People are having children older, and older people are more in tune with what children cost," Shridharani suggested.

In a vasectomy, the sperm-transport system is interrupted by blocking the structure known as the vas deferens, which carries sperm from the testicle to the urethra. If a man changes his mind about wanting children, a reversal often can be done.

Effect on family planning

One expert not involved with the new study said that while the state of the economy definitely has an effect on family planning, the study does not prove definitely that it was the driver for vasectomy request.

"I'm not convinced that the increase can be tied to the recession," said Laura Lindberg, a senior research associate at the Guttmacher Institute.

"There may be an increase in vasectomies due to the recession, but this study doesn't prove that," Lindberg said.

"He can't show that the guys who came in [for a vasectomy] had lower incomes," she pointed out.

"Vasectomy remains a method chosen by higher-income, more highly educated men, so you have a real divide. White, educated men have vasectomies as well as men of colour, and those not highly educated, do not," she added.

The reasons, Lindberg speculated, centred around cultural and masculinity issues, with some men feeling the procedure made them less manly.

The economy does affect family planning decisions, Lindberg noted.

Guttmacher interviewed 947 women, aged 18 to 34, with household incomes of less than $75 000 in the summer of 2009

Lindberg said 64% had said that with the state of the economy at that time, they could not afford to have a baby right then. The more financially strapped they were, the more likely they were to say this.

More information

To learn more about vasectomy, visit the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals.

(Picture: medical scalpel from Shutterstock)

Copyright © 2016 HealthDay. All rights reserved.




Read Health24’s Comments Policy

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Live healthier

Exercise benefits for seniors »

Working out in the concrete jungle Even a little exercise may help prevent dementia Here’s an unexpected way to boost your memory: running

Seniors who exercise recover more quickly from injury or illness

When sedentary older adults got into an exercise routine, it curbed their risk of suffering a disabling injury or illness and helped them recover if anything did happen to them.