Posted by: Anon | 2011-05-30

Why wait so long

My live in partner has a child of 16 years. He pays schools, sees to clothes and cellphone as well as transport. as well as gives her money when she asks, which is every week. The mother now says that he owes her 10 years maintenance. lol... Can the court question the fact of why she waited so long to report arrears. Just asking? Please respond.

Not what you were looking for? Try searching again, or ask your own question
Our expert says:
Expert ImageFamily law expert

It all depends whether there is in fact a court order. If there is a court order and he did not pay in terms of that order then obviously he will be in contempt. If there is no court order in place, then obviously she has no claim. A court order can't be varied between the parties, unless it was made an order of court.

Bertus Preller
B.Proc; AD Dip L Law
Family Law Attorney
Abrahams and Gross Inc.
A:1st Floor, 56 Shortmarket Street, Cape Town, 8000
O: +27 (0) 21 422 1323
Blog: Twitter:

The information provided does not constitute a diagnosis of your condition. You should consult a medical practitioner or other appropriate health care professional for a physical exmanication, diagnosis and formal advice. Health24 and the expert accept no responsibility or liability for any damage or personal harm you may suffer resulting from making use of this content.

Our users say:
Posted by: Romany | 2011-05-31

If the original Court Order said he should pay maintenance to the mother (for the child) and he did not pay for 10 years and also did not advise the court that the child lives with him, had the maintenance order changed etc.... he still owes her for the 10 years.
It makes no difference hhow long she waited to claim the amount he owes her.

Reply to Romany
Posted by: GuGu | 2011-05-31

Although the court will ask obviously, it will not affect her case as you can apply for maintenance any time. Especially if there is an order and for 10 years he did not pay and the court was not told about the reason.
As order is and order, regardless.
So ja, he should have carried on paying until a legal document was put in place that he can stop paying.

Reply to GuGu

Have your say

Thanks for commenting! Your comment will appear on the site shortly.
Thanks for commenting! Your comment will appear on the site shortly.