advertisement
Question
Posted by: Cheryl | 2010/06/24

Very confused about type/types of therapists and their ethics

Dear Doc.

I was thinking of seeing a therapist to work through some difficult and painful childhood problems that I went through and try and stop the patterns repeating in my own family. I have tried so hard not to let them but I am not real ly coping right now. I have been referred to a therapist who I think (this is what my GP told me) is a Jungian therapist. Is this the same thing as a psychoanalyst and are they all suspect ethically?

Regards and thanks
Cheryl


Not what you were looking for? Try searching again, or ask your own question
Our expert says:
Expert ImageCyberShrink

There is no way in which any class of properly trained therapists are at all suspect ethically. The two examples who have been raised in the forum are of individual therapists who behaved in a dodgy way, not particularly related to the particular therapy methods they used.
Psychoanalysts as a group are perhaps more acutely aware of the risks of this sort of therapy, and especially if they work wih a suypervisor, as some routinely do, may be at a lesser risk of running into such problems than those using methods which pay less atention to such potential aspects of therapy.
Psychoanalysis is a complex field, and therapists working within that general method can differ quite significantly in the dominant theories that guide their work, and the specifics of the methods they use. Jungians, following the ideas of Carl Jung who was a rather mystical character, are different from Freudians ( basing their work on the theories of Sigmund Freud ) and there are other divisions and styles.
Personally, as a scientifically rather than ideologically-based shrink, I am not convinced by the evidence I have seen, that any of the primarily psychoanalytically based therapies are especially effective, inclding the Jungian school ; but obviously there are those who think otherwise, usually for less scientifically informed reasons.
So the debate would be about the scientific credentials of a particular method and is effectiveness, rather than ethical issues, as I'd expect all such therapists to be ethically well behaved. With any therapist, you should spend the first session satisfying yourself about any concerns you have, and asking for a clear explanation of their particular personal methods of working, their diagnosis of your problem, and their estimate of how long it will take to produce useful results for you.

The information provided does not constitute a diagnosis of your condition. You should consult a medical practitioner or other appropriate health care professional for a physical exmanication, diagnosis and formal advice. Health24 and the expert accept no responsibility or liability for any damage or personal harm you may suffer resulting from making use of this content.

2
Our users say:
Posted by: Shop around | 2010/06/24

Hi Cheryl

There is no problem with shopping around - after all it is an expensive exercoise and possibly a lifetime investment which should always be propely researched. If you feel in any way uncomfortable - get out before it is 2 late. The thing that scares me is that we are so vulnerable when we go 2 them and often - like me - we struggle to trust so u have 2 be careful. personally i think the 2 shrinks that were unethical should lose their lisences - they are playing with people''s minds and lives which is a huge responsibility.

Reply to Shop around
Posted by: cybershrink | 2010/06/24

There is no way in which any class of properly trained therapists are at all suspect ethically. The two examples who have been raised in the forum are of individual therapists who behaved in a dodgy way, not particularly related to the particular therapy methods they used.
Psychoanalysts as a group are perhaps more acutely aware of the risks of this sort of therapy, and especially if they work wih a suypervisor, as some routinely do, may be at a lesser risk of running into such problems than those using methods which pay less atention to such potential aspects of therapy.
Psychoanalysis is a complex field, and therapists working within that general method can differ quite significantly in the dominant theories that guide their work, and the specifics of the methods they use. Jungians, following the ideas of Carl Jung who was a rather mystical character, are different from Freudians ( basing their work on the theories of Sigmund Freud ) and there are other divisions and styles.
Personally, as a scientifically rather than ideologically-based shrink, I am not convinced by the evidence I have seen, that any of the primarily psychoanalytically based therapies are especially effective, inclding the Jungian school ; but obviously there are those who think otherwise, usually for less scientifically informed reasons.
So the debate would be about the scientific credentials of a particular method and is effectiveness, rather than ethical issues, as I'd expect all such therapists to be ethically well behaved. With any therapist, you should spend the first session satisfying yourself about any concerns you have, and asking for a clear explanation of their particular personal methods of working, their diagnosis of your problem, and their estimate of how long it will take to produce useful results for you.

Reply to cybershrink

Have your say

Thanks for commenting! Your comment will appear on the site shortly.
Thanks for commenting! Your comment will appear on the site shortly.
advertisement