advertisement
Question
Posted by: blessing | 2010-08-27

hiv testing

How reliable is rapid hiv testing after two months of posible exposure.

Not what you were looking for? Try searching again, or ask your own question
Our expert says:
Expert ImageSexologist

Clinical studies showed that the sensitivity and the specificity of rapid HIV tests are comparable other tests often used for screening. The negative predictive value of a screening test is high thus, a patient with a NEGATIVE rapid HIV test result can be sure he or she is NOT infected BUT HIV antibodies take time to develop, and retesting is recommended if you were exposed within the last 3 months.
It may also happen that some results may be false-positive, in which case the rapid test must be confirmed by a supplemental test e.g. Western blot.

The information provided does not constitute a diagnosis of your condition. You should consult a medical practitioner or other appropriate health care professional for a physical exmanication, diagnosis and formal advice. Health24 and the expert accept no responsibility or liability for any damage or personal harm you may suffer resulting from making use of this content.

1
Our users say:
Posted by: sexologist | 2010-08-27

Clinical studies showed that the sensitivity and the specificity of rapid HIV tests are comparable other tests often used for screening. The negative predictive value of a screening test is high thus, a patient with a NEGATIVE rapid HIV test result can be sure he or she is NOT infected BUT HIV antibodies take time to develop, and retesting is recommended if you were exposed within the last 3 months.
It may also happen that some results may be false-positive, in which case the rapid test must be confirmed by a supplemental test e.g. Western blot.

Reply to sexologist

Have your say

Thanks for commenting! Your comment will appear on the site shortly.
Thanks for commenting! Your comment will appear on the site shortly.
advertisement